Opinion | What Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy can learn from China’s reformers

With a bit of flair and a touch of the Queen’s English, let us delve into the intriguing tale of the Musk-Ramaswamy duet, poised to waltz into one of the most formidable reform undertakings in the annals of American political history. This grand endeavour, championed by none other than the illustrious Elon Musk and the astute Vivek Ramaswamy, seeks to profoundly reshape the fabric of American governance. Their shared mission under president-elect Donald Trump’s proposed Department of Government Efficiency is profound: to streamline bureaucracy, reduce the size of government, and thus, metamorphose the way America functions.

Lessons from the Middle Kingdom

Before one unfurls this ambitious tapestry, it’s prudent to cast an eye eastwards, where history offers a plethora of exemplar endeavours in the sphere of reform. Take for instance Shang Yang, whose ancient reforms led to a unified Qin dynasty. His legal and economic innovations stand as invaluable lessons from the annals of China. Then there was Wang Anshi, notable for his New Policies during the Song dynasty. Although his efforts famously faltered, they etched a lasting impression.

And let us not forget Zhang Juzheng, whose Ming dynasty tax reforms, though quite unpopular, were instrumental in propelling the dynasty to its zenith. Laying one’s gaze upon more recent epochs, the sagacious helmsmanship of Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s and Zhu Rongji in the late 1990s come to mind. Under their stewardship, reforms became the order of the day, leaving an indelible mark on China’s modern historical landscape.

Deng Xiaoping’s Revolutionary Plans

Deng Xiaoping approached the task with the zeal of a revolutionary, albeit primarily rewriting economic rules. Special economic zones sprouted, foreign markets opened their arms, and collective farming found itself replaced by household farming. In just slightly over two years, Deng astutely reduced military personnel by a million, unfazed by Vietnam-induced border conflicts.

However, it was Zhu Rongji who might possess the most echoes with the Musk-Ramaswamy vision. Zhu’s 1993-2002 reforms restructured China’s governmental landscape significantly. As central government agencies dwindled from 86 to 59, government employment saw a notable reduction of 20 percent. The closure or privatisation of myriad state-owned enterprises (SOEs) resulted in millions of job losses.

Ambitious Comparisons

Such paradigms of reform offer lessons to Musk and Ramaswamy as they embark on their quest to streamline governance. The objective is clearly not trivial but requires a distinctly bold vision and unwavering resolve.

The parallels with Zhu’s transformative measures hint at the Herculean nature of what lies ahead for America. As they move to restructure, prioritising efficiency, shedding layers of bureaucracy, the potential outcome resonates with echoes of history.

While it remains to be seen how this transformative effort will unfold, the ingredients for significant change are indeed present. Deploying lessons from the ancient to the modern, from East to West, gives one a panoramic canvas to contemplate.

In the end, it is the fusion of such audacious aspirations with lessons learned from time immemorial that posits not just a beacon of hope but a potential redefinition of governance itself. As such, Musk and Ramaswamy are not just embarking on an overhaul, but are, in essence, retracing paths etched by reformers throughout history. Thus, might there be a lesson or two to be gleaned? Time, as it so often is, will be the ultimate judge.