<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VONG Archives &#187; Kingston Global Tokyo Japan</title>
	<atom:link href="https://kingstonglobaljapan.com/tag/vong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Plan Your Future. Reach Your Financial Goals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Comparing Growth Stock ETFs: VONG vs. IWO</title>
		<link>https://kingstonglobaljapan.com/comparing-growth-stock-etfs-vong-vs-iwo/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kingstong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETFs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VONG]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kingstonglobaljapan.com/comparing-growth-stock-etfs-vong-vs-iwo/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Plan your financial future.</p>
<p>Explore how each ETF&#8217;s sector mix, risk profile, and cost structure could shape your growth investing strategy. Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG 0.47%) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO 1.17%) target different corners of the U.S. growth equity market, with VONG leaning large-cap and IWO focusing on small-cap stocks &#8212; resulting in notable [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://kingstonglobaljapan.com/comparing-growth-stock-etfs-vong-vs-iwo/">Comparing Growth Stock ETFs: VONG vs. IWO</a> appeared first on <a href="https://kingstonglobaljapan.com">Kingston Global Tokyo Japan</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plan your financial future.</p>
<p>Explore how each ETF&rsquo;s sector mix, risk profile, and cost structure could shape your growth investing strategy.</p>
<p>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG 0.47%) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO 1.17%) target different corners of the U.S. growth equity market, with VONG leaning large-cap and IWO focusing on small-cap stocks &#8212; resulting in notable differences in cost, risk, and sector exposure.</p>
<p>Both funds aim to capture growth in U.S. equities, but VONG tracks large, established companies from the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while IWO focuses on smaller, up-and-coming firms in the Russell 2000 Growth segment. This comparison examines whether IWO&rsquo;s small-cap approach stands up to VONG&rsquo;s large-cap focus.</p>
<h2>what&#8217;s inside</h2>
<p>The iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) throws its hat in the ring with over 1,000 U.S. small-cap growth stocks, spreading its assets across technology, healthcare, and industrials. Top holdings, like <strong>Bloom Energy</strong>, <strong>Credo Technology Group Holding</strong>, and <strong>Fabrinet</strong>, each clock in at less than 2% of assets. That&rsquo;s a broad and diversified approach for you!</p>
<p>In contrast, the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) swings heavily towards large-cap technology. With a good chunk of the pie in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, VONG shows sensitivity to shifts in mega-cap tech. IWO, meanwhile, offers broader diversification with a nod to emerging growth companies.</p>
<p>For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this <a href="https://www.fool.com/investing/etf-guide">link</a>.</p>
<h2>snapshot (cost &amp; size)</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metric</th>
<th>VONG</th>
<th>IWO</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Issuer</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
<td>iShares</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Expense ratio</td>
<td>0.07%</td>
<td>0.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1-yr return (as of Dec. 15, 2025)</td>
<td>14.4%</td>
<td>10.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dividend yield</td>
<td>0.5%</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Beta</td>
<td>1.17</td>
<td>N/A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AUM</td>
<td>$44.6 billion</td>
<td>$13.2 billion</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&amp;P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.</p>
<p>IWO charges a noticeably higher annual expense ratio than VONG, but it&rsquo;s still below the industry average for ETFs. In exchange, IWO delivers a slightly higher yield, though the difference is modest at just 0.2 percentage points.</p>
<h2>performance &amp; risk comparison</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metric</th>
<th>VONG</th>
<th>IWO</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Max drawdown (5 y)</td>
<td>-32.71%</td>
<td>-42.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Growth of $1,000 over 5 years</td>
<td>$2,064</td>
<td>$1,235</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>what this means for investors</h2>
<p>Since 2010, VONG has delivered total returns of over 1,000% compared to IWO&#8217;s 408%. For perspective, the S&amp;P 500 rose nearly 700% over the same time. While this outperformance might make VONG look like the obvious pick, it&#8217;s not everyone&#8217;s cup of tea.</p>
<p>The main gripe with VONG? It&rsquo;s essentially a concentrated bet on the Magnificent Seven (plus Broadcom). These eight stocks make up 59% of VONG&#8217;s assets. In the S&amp;P 500, the same crowd takes up 38%. So if the Magnificent Seven&rsquo;s race slows or reverses, VONG might not look too pretty.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the IWO ETF rolls out a whole different approach, targeting a wide array of small-cap growth stocks at more reasonable valuations. IWO&#8217;s P/E ratio sits at 24, whereas VONG&#8217;s is a steeper 39.</p>
<p>Personally, I&rsquo;d lean towards IWO, despite its recent underperformance. It&rsquo;d broaden my exposure to stocks I know less about, unlike VONG&rsquo;s laser focus on the attention-grabbing tech giants. And yet, IWO&rsquo;s expense ratio, though higher at 0.24%, trails the ETF industry&rsquo;s average.</p>
<h2>glossary</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>ETF</strong>: Exchange-traded fund; a pooled investment that trades on stock exchanges like a single stock.</li>
<li><strong>Expense ratio</strong>: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges investors for management and operating costs.</li>
<li><strong>Dividend yield</strong>: Annual dividends paid by a fund or stock, expressed as a percentage of its current price.</li>
<li><strong>Beta</strong>: A measure of a fund&#8217;s volatility compared to the overall market, typically the S&amp;P 500.</li>
<li><strong>Max drawdown</strong>: The largest percentage drop from a fund&#8217;s peak value to its lowest point over a specified period.</li>
<li><strong>AUM</strong>: Assets under management; the total market value of assets a fund manages on behalf of investors.</li>
<li><strong>Large-cap</strong>: Companies with large market capitalizations, generally considered more established and stable.</li>
<li><strong>Small-cap</strong>: Companies with smaller market capitalizations, often younger and potentially higher growth but riskier.</li>
<li><strong>S&amp;P 500</strong>: A widely followed index of 500 large U.S. companies, used as a benchmark for the stock market.</li>
<li><strong>Sector diversification</strong>: Spreading investments across different industry sectors to reduce risk.</li>
<li><strong>Total return</strong>: The investment&#8217;s price change plus all dividends and distributions, assuming those payouts are reinvested.</li>
<li><strong>Growth stock</strong>: A company expected to grow earnings or revenue faster than the market average.</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="https://kingstonglobaljapan.com/comparing-growth-stock-etfs-vong-vs-iwo/">Comparing Growth Stock ETFs: VONG vs. IWO</a> appeared first on <a href="https://kingstonglobaljapan.com">Kingston Global Tokyo Japan</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
